Registration Hotline - 01379 740619
Registration Hotline - 01379 740619 - About SGCL -
Simon Gore Consulting Ltd
8 Upper Street, Oakley, Diss, IP21 4AX
Copyright Simon Gore Consulting Ltd (SGCL)
All rights reserved.
Our events are going paperless, find out how this affects you attendance, click here for details
Nuptial Agreements and future-proofing
- Tips and traps in an evolving landscape
27th November, 3-4pm, Broadcast Live and available on demand
Byron James, Expatriat Law,
Peter Newman, 1 KBW
and Jamie Gaw, Forsters
- What level of disclosure is required by the parties? [Including, how should disclosure be approached if there are asset bases which involve third parties e.g. trustees or company directors? When should expert reports be obtained?]
Drafting for the future
- To what extent should an agreement attempt to “crystal-ball gaze”? [Including: dealing with unrealised assets such as inheritance; changes in circumstances – birth of children, length of marriage, change in lifestyle; catastrophic financial collapse; changes in the law; review clauses].
- What approach should be taken if the parties have a connection with other jurisdictions? [Including: Is it advisable to obtain mirror agreements in all jurisdictions with which the parties have a connection?; use of jurisdiction/ arbitration clauses.]
- What steps can be taken to limit exposure to professional negligence claims in the future? [Including e.g. paring down legal certificate, limiting liability in retainer letter, instructing Counsel, use of disclaimer letters.]
- What is the approach post-Radmacher?
- The relevance of the s.25 analysis
Departing from agreements:
- Vitiating agreements altogether (fraud, undue influence, misrepresentation);
- Reducing the weight to be attached within the s.25 analysis
- pressure/emotions/power imbalance
- timing of the agreement
- ‘real’ needs not being met
- Non-disclosure (post-Sharland and Goyal)
- Failure to review the agreement;
- If the agreement does not have decisive weight, how will it feature in the s.25 analysis?
- Is it a standard financial remedy application procedurally?
- Crossley v Crossley case management - when is it appropriate?
- Preliminary issue OR subsumed with the final hearing?
- Non-disclosure may not be apparent until a final hearing;
- ‘Needs’ will not be known until a final hearing.
- Key things to plead in evidence.
CPD = 1 hours
Watching this webinar will help solicitors meet the following requirements set out in the Statement of Solicitor Competence
A2 - Maintain competence and legal knowledge
A4 - Draw on detailed knowledge/understanding
Registration Form - to be invoiced